Skip to main content

FAQ - Resources: Chassis vs Trailer

Qargo supports Chassis as a dedicated resource type, helping teams distinguish chassis from trailers for accurate planning, restrictions, integrations, and container transport workflows.

Written by Arynne Hargreaves

Chassis vs Trailer: When to Use Each

Chassis are now available as a dedicated resource type in Qargo. This helps planners and drivers clearly distinguish container chassis from regular trailers, so planning, restrictions, exports, and integrations behave correctly.

What is a chassis?

A chassis is a wheeled frame designed to carry a container. Unlike a trailer, a chassis has no cargo space of its own—the container is the “load unit.”

In Qargo, chassis are modeled as a first-class resource type so they can be planned, restricted, allocated, and communicated without being misclassified as a trailer.

What is a trailer?

A trailer is equipment used to transport cargo directly (or cargo inside/onto the trailer), and it typically includes trailer-specific attributes (e.g., cargo capacity/compartments/roof type) that do not apply to chassis.


The key difference: use case and behaviour

Use a Chassis when…

Operating intermodal or container-based transport, where the container is the main unit and the chassis is simply the frame that carries it.

Common scenarios:

  • Port / terminal operations where containers are picked up and dropped

  • Drop & swap workflows where chassis may stay in a yard while containers move on/off

  • Intermodal legs (ferry/train) where the container and chassis may have different operational handling

Why this matters:

  • It becomes visually clear in planning which equipment is a chassis vs a trailer

  • Integrations and documents can classify the equipment correctly (instead of sending “TRAILER” where “CHASSIS” is intended)

  • Apply resource restrictions and filters specifically to chassis

Use a Trailer when…

Transporting cargo with a standard trailer workflow, where the trailer itself is the relevant equipment type.

Common scenarios:

  • Standard road transport using dry vans, reefers, curtainsiders, etc.

  • When trailer-specific fields and behaviour are required (cargo capacity, compartments, roof type)

Example 1 — Container drayage (typical chassis use case)

A driver picks up a container from a terminal on a chassis, drives to a customer site, drops the container, and later returns with the empty container.

Use a Chassis because:

  • The container is the cargo unit

  • Planning needs to show equipment as “chassis” (not “trailer”)

  • Intermodal/EDI and reporting need correct classification

Example 2 — General freight (typical trailer use case)

A driver hauls goods in a trailer from warehouse A to warehouse B.

Use a Trailer because:

  • The trailer is the cargo-carrying unit

  • Trailer configuration fields and trailer-based workflows apply


What changes for users in Qargo?

1) Clearer planning & fewer mistakes

Chassis appear as their own resource type, so planners and drivers no longer need to interpret “trailers” that are actually chassis.

This reduces:

  • Planning board confusion

  • Incorrect allocations (the wrong equipment used)

  • Driver confusion when equipment type matters operationally


2) Chassis have trailer-like behaviour—without cargo-related fields

Chassis reuse most of the same configuration structure as trailers, but chassis do not include cargo-specific properties.

Chassis do not use:

  • Cargo capacity fields (e.g., loading meters, pallet spaces, volume, payload)

  • Compartments

  • Roof type

Chassis do use (examples):

  • General info (name/code/license plate/VIN/manufacturer/model, etc.)

  • Dimensions (length/width/height, tare weight, GVWR, etc.)

  • Planning availability and allocation behaviour (like other equipment resources)


3) Migration note: cannot convert a trailer into a chassis

Previously registered chassis as trailers, cannot be switched in place.

To migrate:

  1. Export your existing “chassis-as-trailer” resources

  2. Archive/deactivate the old trailer records

  3. Re-import them as Chassis using the resource master data import

📚 Click the link 👉 to learn more about Importing Resources


FAQ

Why not keep using trailers for chassis?

Using trailers as a workaround makes chassis invisible in planning and can cause incorrect classification in integrations, exports, and operational flows. A dedicated chassis type prevents those issues and aligns with real-world operations.

Does this change how I assign equipment?

Assign chassis where equipment assignment is supported, and filter/restrict them specifically as chassis (instead of mixing them into trailer-only workflows).

Did this answer your question?